Showing posts with label sap new general ledger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sap new general ledger. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
SAP New GL extensibility and real-time FERC data
Today, we have more news about prototyping the SAP New GL and real-time FERC for a utility company in the midwest. We've been busy testing primary and secondary cost postings to the new functional areas that we'll use for FERC derivation.
Contact us to learn more.
Interested in this type of project for your utility? Check out our New GL prototyping service.
ShareThisFriday, June 1, 2012
Functional Areas, FERC, and the SAP New General Ledger
We have now completed the proof-of-concept that secondary cost postings will indeed update the General Ledger. This was not possible prior to the New GL, except for cross-company transactions.
Contact us to learn more.
Stay turned for more updates on our progress later this summer.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
SAP New GL prototyping - continued
We've now gotten deep into the data redesign for prototyping the SAP New General Ledger at a utility company in the midwest.
During this pre-migration discovery phase, our joint HPC-client team has also identified a number of areas in which the utility could benefit from a larger SAP footprint, including extending Plant Maintenance to a greater portion of its business; utilizing Project Systems to manage schedules while FI/CO manages costs; and implementing a Fleet Management solution that tracks per-vehicle costs. More on this latter opportunity in the near future, as we're just about to roll one out at Sonoma County Water Agency that will be applicable to many other utilities and municipalities that want to track fuel consumption and vehicle costs as part of sustainability initiatives.
During this pre-migration discovery phase, our joint HPC-client team has also identified a number of areas in which the utility could benefit from a larger SAP footprint, including extending Plant Maintenance to a greater portion of its business; utilizing Project Systems to manage schedules while FI/CO manages costs; and implementing a Fleet Management solution that tracks per-vehicle costs. More on this latter opportunity in the near future, as we're just about to roll one out at Sonoma County Water Agency that will be applicable to many other utilities and municipalities that want to track fuel consumption and vehicle costs as part of sustainability initiatives.
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Document Splitting and the Balance Sheet in SAP New GL
In all of our previous posts about the SAP New General Ledger, we've only looked at P&L accounts. But what about the balance sheet? Using the New GL will eliminate either the accounts approach or the company code approach to IFRS compliance using SAP. A somewhat complicated feature is the use of document splitting, which we'll touch on next.
Let's suppose a vendor is paid with invoice line items charged to both generation and transmission on the same invoice, but with only one offset to the vendor account on the balance sheet. Using document splitting, the offset account charged to accounts payable is allocated or "split" between the generation and transmission lines. So, if $300 is charged to generation and $500 charged to transmission on the same invoice, the offset for the total of $800 is split to "follow" the P&L accounts that were charged originally. By doing this split, separate balance sheets can be generated for each segment (i.e., generation and transmission) below the company code level. This will save time during document entry, as the preparer doesn't have to be affected by a process change. An employee in Accounts Payable doesn't change his SAP business process. Rather, in the background, SAP will split the transactions entered to create the separation by segment.
Document splitting can be a complicated undertaking and shouldn't be conducted without ample testing. In fact, a utility's New GL conversion scenario should consider the impact of document splitting when determining a migration data and activation date. Since most large utilities can have thousands of open items during a New GL migration, it is suggested—and we highly recommend—to set an activation date as close to the migration date as possible to limit the amount of documents (and line items) that will need to be split.
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
SAP New GL and FERC Data
We're on an SAP New General Ledger roll. Expanding on our prior posts (1, 2, and 3), we had some further thoughts about New GL migration strategy and FERC data. For utilities that have been on the Classic GL and IS-U/FERC module for many years, a New GL migration will certainly not be undertaken without careful consideration and risk management. We recently put together some top-level deployment scenarios that mitigate risk and provide a utility with different options before committing to a specific one for production.
This SAP New GL migration approach retains the existing FERC module, while concurrently developing a prototype of the New GL that shows FERC accounts posted to GL in real-time. We would show finance stakeholders how to render the FERC account assignments to actual New GL line items in the FAGLFLEXT (totals) and FAGLFLXA (transaction) tables. Based on our combined knowledge of the New GL and the existing IS-U/FERC module, we would build a model that shows the actual FERC accounts in the Functional Area field of the New GL. In addition, based on the utility's assignment of regulatory indicators to both internal and PM orders, we could use the actual CO object assignments to regulatory indicators to create a Business Add-In to populate the Functional Areas in the New GL for both primary and secondary cost element assignments. In cases where full FERC_C3 (Trace table rules) apply for assignment of A&G (e.g. account 923 Outside Services), we would deploy substitution rules to assign the correct functional area.
As a result of this prototype, the utility would see a direct integration of CO to FERC for all activity type charges, assessments, and overheads (all CO module allocations) to each FERC account. The utility would gain real-time FERC derivation at the point of document entry. We would also demonstrate how users could overwrite the FERC assignments (a feature some accountants may find useful) during document simulation prior to posting (e.g., transactions FB50N/FB50L).
But that's not all: we could also link all secondary costs to the New GL such that any transaction posted in CO would update the Functional Area postings to capture cost movements between CO objects that affect FERC account assignments in the Functional Area.
Through this migration approach, the utility would have the choice of maintaining its existing FERC module or deploying the real-time, fully integrated New GL solution by reviewing real-world test data before making a decision on which method to use in production. With our prototype, financial stakeholders would see how to present FERC account information as each source document is entered, thereby eliminating a month-end close process to run the FERC trace and drilldown. In addition, the accounting department would be able to override FERC derivation on the fly during document entry and simulation, a feature not available with the classic FERC module.
This SAP New GL migration approach retains the existing FERC module, while concurrently developing a prototype of the New GL that shows FERC accounts posted to GL in real-time. We would show finance stakeholders how to render the FERC account assignments to actual New GL line items in the FAGLFLEXT (totals) and FAGLFLXA (transaction) tables. Based on our combined knowledge of the New GL and the existing IS-U/FERC module, we would build a model that shows the actual FERC accounts in the Functional Area field of the New GL. In addition, based on the utility's assignment of regulatory indicators to both internal and PM orders, we could use the actual CO object assignments to regulatory indicators to create a Business Add-In to populate the Functional Areas in the New GL for both primary and secondary cost element assignments. In cases where full FERC_C3 (Trace table rules) apply for assignment of A&G (e.g. account 923 Outside Services), we would deploy substitution rules to assign the correct functional area.
As a result of this prototype, the utility would see a direct integration of CO to FERC for all activity type charges, assessments, and overheads (all CO module allocations) to each FERC account. The utility would gain real-time FERC derivation at the point of document entry. We would also demonstrate how users could overwrite the FERC assignments (a feature some accountants may find useful) during document simulation prior to posting (e.g., transactions FB50N/FB50L).
But that's not all: we could also link all secondary costs to the New GL such that any transaction posted in CO would update the Functional Area postings to capture cost movements between CO objects that affect FERC account assignments in the Functional Area.
Through this migration approach, the utility would have the choice of maintaining its existing FERC module or deploying the real-time, fully integrated New GL solution by reviewing real-world test data before making a decision on which method to use in production. With our prototype, financial stakeholders would see how to present FERC account information as each source document is entered, thereby eliminating a month-end close process to run the FERC trace and drilldown. In addition, the accounting department would be able to override FERC derivation on the fly during document entry and simulation, a feature not available with the classic FERC module.
Monday, August 29, 2011
Why Migrate to the SAP New GL?
When SAP promotes a new solution, it is usually about something we haven't seen before. So when the New General Ledger solution was announced, we thought, "What could be new about something as basic as the general ledger?" Well, a lot actually. Expanding on our prior posts about the benefits of the New GL and SAP Migration Scenario 1, today we'll explore a few key reasons why a utility already running SAP would consider migrating to the New General Ledger.
First, let's be clear, if you're running the classic SAP FI-GL, you don't have to migrate to the New GL when you upgrade. SAP has made the election to migrate a separate project from an upgrade. If you're getting what you need today from Classic GL, then you can stay put. But before you jump to the conclusion that you just don't need it, here are a few observations and suggestions to consider.
If you've been running SAP for a few years, you probably already know that the Controlling module works together with the General Ledger. In some cases it doesn't. We're referring to the differences between primary and secondary cost elements. CO is used for cost accounting. In the New GL, parts of CO are resident in the New GL. For example, the functional area, profit center and segment are part of the new general ledger table now called FAGLFLEXT instead of the familiar GLT0. Why add these fields to the General Ledger? Well, with the coming of more regulation around the use of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), companies will need base financials on a segment of the business to comply with SEC requirements. A segment can be shown directly in the New General Ledger.
What we really find intriguing is the melding of the traditional Controlling module with the traditionally separated FI-GL. Rather than relegate the FI-GL to merely tracking account balances with links to the CO documents, SAP put CO objects alongside FI-GL accounts in the same table. The result: no reconciliation differences between CO and FI. This in turn speeds-up monthly closing, and makes segment reporting much more streamlined.
Utilities running the IS-U/FERC module can continue to use it with the New GL. FERC will still use CO tables to run the flow of costs trace, trace post, and direct post. The FERC drilldown will continue to store source and final objects in FERC_D1 to support the FERC balances in the new FIGLFLEXT table. But with the New GL, utilities have yet another option: to use the New GL to derive functional areas equivalent to the operations, maintenance, administration and general, and customer accounts expenses to stay in compliance—for example, with Title 18 of the Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 101 for electric utilities.
So what are the advantages to utilities? Well, the New GL offers a way to provide line item FERC accounting for every transaction. Rather than derive FERC at the close of each month, utilities can consider FERC derivation in real time at the point of document entry. Such real time posting to FERC is possible by linking the CO object to a functional area. When charged, the CO object (e.g., internal order, PM order, cost center, or WBS element) will assign the functional area linked to the CO object to a field on the new GL table FAGLFLEXT.
We were skeptical of this approach due to the fact that secondary costs aren't posted to the New GL. Well, indeed they can be, but not as you might expect. Since secondary cost elements result in a net zero impact to the FI-GL (with the one exception of capital orders settling externally) secondary costs can be mapped to a General Ledger account via the CO transaction code. That means that assessments, overheads, and settlement cost elements can be mapped to the New GL. This is important because the CO objects charged with a secondary cost element are assigned a functional area needed for FERC reporting. The functional area from the CO object is thus updated in the New GL.
First, let's be clear, if you're running the classic SAP FI-GL, you don't have to migrate to the New GL when you upgrade. SAP has made the election to migrate a separate project from an upgrade. If you're getting what you need today from Classic GL, then you can stay put. But before you jump to the conclusion that you just don't need it, here are a few observations and suggestions to consider.
If you've been running SAP for a few years, you probably already know that the Controlling module works together with the General Ledger. In some cases it doesn't. We're referring to the differences between primary and secondary cost elements. CO is used for cost accounting. In the New GL, parts of CO are resident in the New GL. For example, the functional area, profit center and segment are part of the new general ledger table now called FAGLFLEXT instead of the familiar GLT0. Why add these fields to the General Ledger? Well, with the coming of more regulation around the use of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), companies will need base financials on a segment of the business to comply with SEC requirements. A segment can be shown directly in the New General Ledger.
What we really find intriguing is the melding of the traditional Controlling module with the traditionally separated FI-GL. Rather than relegate the FI-GL to merely tracking account balances with links to the CO documents, SAP put CO objects alongside FI-GL accounts in the same table. The result: no reconciliation differences between CO and FI. This in turn speeds-up monthly closing, and makes segment reporting much more streamlined.
Utilities running the IS-U/FERC module can continue to use it with the New GL. FERC will still use CO tables to run the flow of costs trace, trace post, and direct post. The FERC drilldown will continue to store source and final objects in FERC_D1 to support the FERC balances in the new FIGLFLEXT table. But with the New GL, utilities have yet another option: to use the New GL to derive functional areas equivalent to the operations, maintenance, administration and general, and customer accounts expenses to stay in compliance—for example, with Title 18 of the Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 101 for electric utilities.
So what are the advantages to utilities? Well, the New GL offers a way to provide line item FERC accounting for every transaction. Rather than derive FERC at the close of each month, utilities can consider FERC derivation in real time at the point of document entry. Such real time posting to FERC is possible by linking the CO object to a functional area. When charged, the CO object (e.g., internal order, PM order, cost center, or WBS element) will assign the functional area linked to the CO object to a field on the new GL table FAGLFLEXT.
We were skeptical of this approach due to the fact that secondary costs aren't posted to the New GL. Well, indeed they can be, but not as you might expect. Since secondary cost elements result in a net zero impact to the FI-GL (with the one exception of capital orders settling externally) secondary costs can be mapped to a General Ledger account via the CO transaction code. That means that assessments, overheads, and settlement cost elements can be mapped to the New GL. This is important because the CO objects charged with a secondary cost element are assigned a functional area needed for FERC reporting. The functional area from the CO object is thus updated in the New GL.
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
SAP New GL Migration via SAP Scenario 1: Merging FI Ledgers
A couple weeks ago we wrote about the benefits of migrating to the SAP New General Ledger for utilities on SAP. SAP best practices outline five different General Ledger migration scenarios that offer increasing amounts of functionality—and corresponding complexity. For utilities looking for an efficient approach, we recommend the least costly and complex, "Scenario 1: Merging of FI Ledgers."
In this scenario, the classic General Ledger (Ledger 0) is migrated. Table GLT3 of the consolidation preparation (Ledger 09) is migrated as well if it's in use. When we work with clients on SAP New General Ledger migrations, we evaluate whether to assign profit and loss accounts from the 8A ledger or to form Ledger 0.
Depending on the utility's financials, we may recommend an "accounts approach," taking all accounts from Ledger 0. In our experience, profit center accounting (PCA) will not, nor should not, drive the migration project. Rather, PCA is planned during blueprint. Configuration changes are made as required, and then PCA is re-introduced to PRD in the new year. What we mean by "re-introduced" is a new way of tagging the PCA to the CO object using the FMDERIVER.
This approach allows our customers the most flexibility to change the PC assignment to the internal order later on. This is especially helpful to utilities that also use SAP Funds Management (FM) since the fund assignment can be updated in the FMDERIVER as well. Our latest solution, HPC Utility Financials Accelerator, automates these updates with an Excel upload program to make maintenance incredibly simple, even on a very large scale.
While there are other, more complex migration scenarios that involve segment reporting and some form of document splitting to parse the balance sheet line items to enable business area financials at a line item level, we don't often recommend them to our customers who are already running HPC Utility Financials Accelerator. For those utilities, business area reporting by balance sheet can be accomplished for all company codes using UFA's expanded functionality. Once migrated, the FERC drill-down feature in UFA is updated to source the FERC account balances from the new FAGLFLEXT table in the SAP New GL.
In this scenario, the classic General Ledger (Ledger 0) is migrated. Table GLT3 of the consolidation preparation (Ledger 09) is migrated as well if it's in use. When we work with clients on SAP New General Ledger migrations, we evaluate whether to assign profit and loss accounts from the 8A ledger or to form Ledger 0.
Depending on the utility's financials, we may recommend an "accounts approach," taking all accounts from Ledger 0. In our experience, profit center accounting (PCA) will not, nor should not, drive the migration project. Rather, PCA is planned during blueprint. Configuration changes are made as required, and then PCA is re-introduced to PRD in the new year. What we mean by "re-introduced" is a new way of tagging the PCA to the CO object using the FMDERIVER.
This approach allows our customers the most flexibility to change the PC assignment to the internal order later on. This is especially helpful to utilities that also use SAP Funds Management (FM) since the fund assignment can be updated in the FMDERIVER as well. Our latest solution, HPC Utility Financials Accelerator, automates these updates with an Excel upload program to make maintenance incredibly simple, even on a very large scale.
While there are other, more complex migration scenarios that involve segment reporting and some form of document splitting to parse the balance sheet line items to enable business area financials at a line item level, we don't often recommend them to our customers who are already running HPC Utility Financials Accelerator. For those utilities, business area reporting by balance sheet can be accomplished for all company codes using UFA's expanded functionality. Once migrated, the FERC drill-down feature in UFA is updated to source the FERC account balances from the new FAGLFLEXT table in the SAP New GL.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
